🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based citizen has been found guilty of uploading nude segments from protected movies and television shows on the social media platform Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement document obtained by media outlets, the unnamed individual shared 347 clips of nude scenes in a subreddit he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.

Danish authorities state he has been given a 7-month suspended jail term for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts say the man was charged under a rarely-used clause in Danish copyright law, with the court finding that by removing the scenes out of their original context, the accused had damaged the performers' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been convicted of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the user using the alias "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit scenes including over 100 actresses.

He shared them in the forum he was a moderator of.

According to the Denmark's anti-piracy group the Rights Alliance, his online community had more than 6,000 members and users were encouraged to request excerpts of particular actors.

In 2023, campaigners filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the impacted artists, filmmakers and producers, which led to the subreddit being closed down.

One actress, one of the actresses whose explicit content were shared in the community, explained to local media at the period she believed there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a film and appearing on Reddit.

The performer stated the posts constituted "exploitation".

'An important signal'

The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and pleaded guilty to the allegations recently.

In a comment following the ruling, TRA head the organization's leader said the decision sent an "significant" signal "that violations of creators' rights have repercussions".

The ruling is viewed as unique in the country for its use of the "moral rights" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an artist's creation cannot be used in a way which violates their reputation.

Copyright law specialist a legal scholar told the media the legal matter was "unusual" for its focus on the damage to the integrity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

How the case could influence other countries is unclear.

But she said there may be "more and more of these actions" in the future with the growth of AI, where "the integrity of one's creative output might be tempered with with greater ease".